<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for phpslacker</title>
	<atom:link href="http://phpslacker.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://phpslacker.com</link>
	<description>yet another g33k blog *sigh*</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 16:33:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on session-clustering with memcache by phpslacker</title>
		<link>http://phpslacker.com/2009/03/02/php-session-clustering-with-memcache/#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator>phpslacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 16:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phpslacker.com/?p=197#comment-240</guid>
		<description>actually sessions are stored in both instances until it crashes. how keys are stored in the server pool is dependent on which hash strategy is used. a &quot;consistent&quot; strategy will allow servers to be added and/or removed from the pool without remapping of keys.

memcache servers are independent and totally unaware of &quot;peers&quot;. the so-called load-balancing is done client-side ie. the hashing algorithm determines this</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>actually sessions are stored in both instances until it crashes. how keys are stored in the server pool is dependent on which hash strategy is used. a &#8220;consistent&#8221; strategy will allow servers to be added and/or removed from the pool without remapping of keys.</p>
<p>memcache servers are independent and totally unaware of &#8220;peers&#8221;. the so-called load-balancing is done client-side ie. the hashing algorithm determines this</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on session-clustering with memcache by yaw</title>
		<link>http://phpslacker.com/2009/03/02/php-session-clustering-with-memcache/#comment-239</link>
		<dc:creator>yaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 16:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phpslacker.com/?p=197#comment-239</guid>
		<description>Hi all,
I understand that when I set two memcached servers in &quot;save_path&quot;, sessions will be stored only in first instance, until it crashes. 
There isn&#039;t any loadbalancing between instances. Am I right ?

Could someone tell me if following parameters are useful ?
=&gt; persistent=1&amp;weight=1&amp;timeout=1&amp;retry_interval=15

Many thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all,<br />
I understand that when I set two memcached servers in &#8220;save_path&#8221;, sessions will be stored only in first instance, until it crashes.<br />
There isn&#8217;t any loadbalancing between instances. Am I right ?</p>
<p>Could someone tell me if following parameters are useful ?<br />
=&gt; persistent=1&amp;weight=1&amp;timeout=1&amp;retry_interval=15</p>
<p>Many thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The real reason why Flash is not on the iPhone,iPad and iPod Touch by phpslacker</title>
		<link>http://phpslacker.com/2010/02/22/the-real-reason-why-flash-is-not-on-the-iphoneipad/#comment-238</link>
		<dc:creator>phpslacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 04:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phpslacker.com/?p=251#comment-238</guid>
		<description>Hey ur right. I knew i was saying something dodgy when i mentioned the A4 cpu. I had an itchy feeling that &quot;proprietary&quot; wasn&#039;t the right thing to say. Fixing the post now. thanks man</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey ur right. I knew i was saying something dodgy when i mentioned the A4 cpu. I had an itchy feeling that &#8220;proprietary&#8221; wasn&#8217;t the right thing to say. Fixing the post now. thanks man</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The real reason why Flash is not on the iPhone,iPad and iPod Touch by robojerk</title>
		<link>http://phpslacker.com/2010/02/22/the-real-reason-why-flash-is-not-on-the-iphoneipad/#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>robojerk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 23:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phpslacker.com/?p=251#comment-237</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s nothing really proprietary about the A4 chip in the iPad.  Fist of all the A4 is not a CPU, it&#039;s a SoC (System on a Chip) that has an ARM Cortex-A9, and a GPU on it.

http://www.brightsideofnews.com/news/2010/1/27/apple-a4-soc-unveiled---its-an-arm-cpu-and-the-gpu!.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s nothing really proprietary about the A4 chip in the iPad.  Fist of all the A4 is not a CPU, it&#8217;s a SoC (System on a Chip) that has an ARM Cortex-A9, and a GPU on it.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.brightsideofnews.com/news/2010/1/27/apple-a4-soc-unveiled---its-an-arm-cpu-and-the-gpu" rel="nofollow">http://www.brightsideofnews.com/news/2010/1/27/apple-a4-soc-unveiled&#8212;its-an-arm-cpu-and-the-gpu</a>!.aspx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The real reason why Flash is not on the iPhone,iPad and iPod Touch by ipadfanboy</title>
		<link>http://phpslacker.com/2010/02/22/the-real-reason-why-flash-is-not-on-the-iphoneipad/#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>ipadfanboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phpslacker.com/?p=251#comment-236</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ll see if the new version of Flash (10.1, which fixes the CPU-hogging problem and crashing problem) changes anything in regards to Flash on the iPhone/iPad.  There&#039;s still time for Apple to support it before the iPad releases and/or with a software update.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ll see if the new version of Flash (10.1, which fixes the CPU-hogging problem and crashing problem) changes anything in regards to Flash on the iPhone/iPad.  There&#8217;s still time for Apple to support it before the iPad releases and/or with a software update.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on vim tips for php programmers by david</title>
		<link>http://phpslacker.com/2009/02/05/vim-tips-for-php-programmers/#comment-235</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 07:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phpslacker.com/?p=84#comment-235</guid>
		<description>Sorry type for the last sentence, it should read &quot;now I CAN NOT use any other editor anymore&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry type for the last sentence, it should read &#8220;now I CAN NOT use any other editor anymore&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on vim tips for php programmers by david</title>
		<link>http://phpslacker.com/2009/02/05/vim-tips-for-php-programmers/#comment-234</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 07:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phpslacker.com/?p=84#comment-234</guid>
		<description>You obviously don&#039;t have any clue how powerful and intuitive vim is once you know the commands. I have used all the existing text editors existence in the world and I have settled with vim 2 years ago, now I can use any other editor anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You obviously don&#8217;t have any clue how powerful and intuitive vim is once you know the commands. I have used all the existing text editors existence in the world and I have settled with vim 2 years ago, now I can use any other editor anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on session-clustering with memcache by PerroVerd</title>
		<link>http://phpslacker.com/2009/03/02/php-session-clustering-with-memcache/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>PerroVerd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phpslacker.com/?p=197#comment-233</guid>
		<description>Just wanted to thank you for the article. It saved my day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to thank you for the article. It saved my day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on session-clustering with memcache by ways to build session server (cluster) &#187; Xrigher</title>
		<link>http://phpslacker.com/2009/03/02/php-session-clustering-with-memcache/#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator>ways to build session server (cluster) &#187; Xrigher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phpslacker.com/?p=197#comment-232</guid>
		<description>[...] Using memcache. We could install memcache extension with &#8220;session feature&#8221;, and configure the session store. Here is a instruction: http://phpslacker.com/2009/03/02/php-session-clustering-with-memcache/. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Using memcache. We could install memcache extension with &#8220;session feature&#8221;, and configure the session store. Here is a instruction: <a href="http://phpslacker.com/2009/03/02/php-session-clustering-with-memcache/" rel="nofollow">http://phpslacker.com/2009/03/02/php-session-clustering-with-memcache/</a>. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on session-clustering with memcache by Beier</title>
		<link>http://phpslacker.com/2009/03/02/php-session-clustering-with-memcache/#comment-230</link>
		<dc:creator>Beier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 10:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phpslacker.com/?p=197#comment-230</guid>
		<description>Instead of wring session data to db every 5th time, which could still cause data lost, you can md5 session data after read, and the md5 new session data before write. if md5 value is the same, then nothing changed so no need to write, otherwise write, this can save lots of writes to db, which could be the potential bottleneck long term</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Instead of wring session data to db every 5th time, which could still cause data lost, you can md5 session data after read, and the md5 new session data before write. if md5 value is the same, then nothing changed so no need to write, otherwise write, this can save lots of writes to db, which could be the potential bottleneck long term</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
